Max for live visuals using ableton
- #MAX FOR LIVE VISUALS USING ABLETON SOFTWARE#
- #MAX FOR LIVE VISUALS USING ABLETON CODE#
- #MAX FOR LIVE VISUALS USING ABLETON FREE#
![max for live visuals using ableton max for live visuals using ableton](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/cbvdNzthPEU/maxresdefault.jpg)
#MAX FOR LIVE VISUALS USING ABLETON SOFTWARE#
But it seems unlikely that Ableton would want to be involved in software that could be used in the context of their DAW competitors. Will this development eliminate the possibility of being able to use Max to write plugins for other DAWs in the future? Although Pluggo (an extension to write VSTs) was sidelined several years ago, I had hoped another means would eventually arise.Relatedly, will the creation of the Max standalone be a continued option? Does this alliance point to the possibility that Max may not be offered as an individual product someday? The idea of needing Ableton to run Max would a huge blow to hardcore Max users.But I can’t help but have a few concerns, so here they are: Hopefully it’s all good and the partnership will strengthen both entities and ultimately yield superior products. So what’s the problem with the purchase of Cycling 74 by Ableton Live? Hopefully nothing. There is a plethora of 3rd party support and participation in development that is entrenched in many universities, user groups, and a vibrant and loyal community.
![max for live visuals using ableton max for live visuals using ableton](https://cycling74-web-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/53c6f1e24bab09a6155160f3/2019-10-29T16:54:05Z/Surround_panner-feature.jpg)
It has become the goto software for computer interactive performance and sound installation work. Since then it has expanded to include a huge library of objects for manipulating and generating audio (MSP) and video (Jitter), controlling external devices, and interpreting sensor data.
#MAX FOR LIVE VISUALS USING ABLETON CODE#
The idea behind Max was a landmark solution that bridged the gap between arcane computer code and accessibility to programming in a musical context using a graphic oriented object-based model. In 1997, Opcode sold the brand to Cycling ’74, a company founded by David Zicarelli, who was integral to the development of Max early on. Puckette released Pd (Pure Data) in 1996, an open source version of Max still available and widely used. Max/MSP (originally simply Max with no audio capability, just MIDI) was developed by Miller Puckette at IRCAM in the mid 80’s and sold to Opcode in 1989. It’s an elegant solution for live performance that has surpassed any other approach I’ve seen…with the exception of Max/MSP. Their Clip view allows for the non-linear launching of sound files which can be easily accessed via Ableton’s own Push MIDI controller. Originally launched in 2001 (co-founded by Gerhard Behles and Robert Henke), this unique DAW offers a significantly different view and interface from most other applications on the market. I’m assuming most people are familiar or at least aware of the rise of Ableton Live especially in the last few years. So, as a user of Max/MSP since 1992 (at which time it was known simply as Max and owned by Opcode) I find myself both concerned and excited by this news.
#MAX FOR LIVE VISUALS USING ABLETON FREE#
One only needs to look as far as the Internet provider market to realize that there are sanctioned monopolies in our supposedly free market economy allowed to fix prices and undermine any real competition. It seems often that these types of business decisions are not designed to benefit the consumer, but to consolidate influence and power, reduce consumer choice, and all but eliminate price competition. Whenever I hear of mergers and companies buying other companies my usual response is one of dismay or impending doom.
![max for live visuals using ableton max for live visuals using ableton](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/A10qlxDQlIL._SL500_.png)
Just received word that Ableton Live has purchased Cycling ’74, the company behind Max/MSP and the visual component Jitter.